Squadi vs PlayHQ — comparing the competition platforms clubs inherit

Most software a club uses is bought. This pair is issued. Somewhere above your committee, a governing body signed a contract, and one Tuesday in the pre-season an email arrives explaining that registrations open on the new platform in a fortnight and here is a webinar link. Nobody at your club voted. Nobody at your club was asked. The volunteers who will spend the next six months inside the thing find out at the same time as the parents.

That is the honest context for comparing Squadi and PlayHQ. They are both Australian, both distributed through governing bodies rather than sold to clubs, and in most cases you will end up on whichever one your sport picked. Plenty of committees run volunteers across two codes and end up in both — a netball club whose juniors register through one, whose members also help at a touch football program running on the other, and who spend the season translating between them.

So this is not a shopping comparison. It is a briefing on two pieces of inherited infrastructure — what each is funded by and therefore what your participants pay, how each handles the weekly grind of fixtures, results and officials, and, most usefully, what each one leaves entirely on the club's plate. We are ClubHelix, an all-in-one club platform, and we should be clear about our angle up front — we do not bid for governing-body competition contracts, so we are not trying to displace either of these. We build the club-facing layer that both of them stop short of. Facts below are from public sources current as at July 2026, and where something is not published we say so instead of estimating.

Two platforms you did not choose

PlayHQ is the national competition platform for four of the country's biggest participation sports — Australian rules football, cricket, basketball and netball — through contracts with their national bodies. Based in Melbourne, it runs fixtures, ladders, results and registrations at national scale, and it has extended further into payments by acquiring the payments product TeamPay. It is not a club website product and it does not present itself as one. It is competition rails, built to carry an entire sport.

Squadi is the newer Australian entrant, distributed the same way — through governing-body deals rather than direct club sales. Its known footprint includes Football Queensland, Touch Football Australia and netball programs. Its scope is registration and competition management, and it carries some capabilities that matter a great deal at ground level: referee appointment and payments, team sheets, match-day tools and instalment payment options for participants. Its club-facing administration and website surface, by contrast, is thin.

The useful distinction is not "which is better software". It is that both are competition and registration engines that arrive attached to your affiliation, and the club's job is to work out what has been covered and what has not.

Side by side

Where a cell says "not published" or "not something we can verify", that is deliberate. There are third-party listings floating around with per-registration and per-user figures attached to these platforms; they contradict each other and none of them stands up to a check against a primary source, so we will not repeat numbers we cannot stand behind.

How each is funded, and what your participants actually pay

This is the row that changes committee decisions, so it is worth slowing down.

Neither platform is funded the way ordinary club software is funded. PlayHQ is paid for by contracts with the national bodies of the sports it serves, and clubs do not pay it a subscription. The cost surfaces instead on the participant side as transaction fees, and those are set sport by sport rather than platform-wide. The one documented example we can point to is cricket, where Cricket Australia's own support material describes a 1.49% processing fee added to the participant and 1.80% deducted before funds are disbursed. That is one sport's arrangement — do not assume it is yours. Get your own governing body's fee schedule in writing.

Squadi is distributed the same way, through governing-body deals. Football Queensland states that there are no Football Queensland or Squadi platform costs to clubs under its arrangement. Again, read that precisely: it is a statement about one state body's deal, not a general price list. How Squadi is funded beyond those contracts is not published, and we are not going to guess at it.

The practical lesson for a treasurer is that "free to the club" describes a single line in the budget — the subscription — and says nothing about what a family pays at the checkout. Total participation cost is a stack, and most of it is invisible to the person paying:

When a parent complains that registration has gone up, they complain to the club, because the club is the only party in that stack they can actually find. Being able to break the stack down — ideally on your own website, in plain language — is one of the more valuable half-hours a registrar spends all year.

Instalments deserve a specific mention because they change who can play. Squadi supports instalment payments for participants, and for a family registering three children in one week, splitting that bill is the difference between joining now and joining maybe. If your platform offers it, use it and say so loudly in your registration comms. If it does not, that is a genuine question to put to your association.

Six questions worth asking your governing body before the season, whichever platform you inherit:

1. What is the exact fee stack for a junior, a senior and a family, itemised?
2. Which portion of that lands in the club's account, and when?
3. Is there a participant-facing processing surcharge, and at what rate?
4. Are instalments available, and who carries the risk if a plan defaults?
5. What is the refund process, and who decides — the club, the association or the platform?
6. What happens to registration data at the end of the season, and can the club export its own?

Question six is the one clubs forget. Our guide to refunds for club registrations covers the money side of the same conversation.

Fixtures, ladders, results and the people who run the game

Both platforms exist to turn a competition into a schedule and a schedule into a ladder. Where they differ is what happens around the edges of match day.

PlayHQ's strength is scale and the public data layer that comes with it. Fixture, ladder and result pages for its sports are where players, parents and grandparents simply look things up, and because every competition sits on the same rails, that lookup works the same way across the country. That consistency is a real gift to a volunteer who would otherwise be answering "what time are we on Saturday" by text message forty times a week.

Squadi's distinguishing strength at ground level is officials. Referee appointment and payment is a weekly job somebody currently does with a spreadsheet, a group chat and a shoebox of cash, and a platform that handles appointment and payment together removes a genuinely thankless task. Add team sheets and match-day tooling and you have a product designed by people who have stood next to a court with a clipboard.

Whichever you are on, the club-side chain looks the same, and only part of it is automated:

The three "no" rows are exactly where clubs lose their weekends, and they are all communications rather than competition problems. If you want the mechanics of the draw itself, we have written how to make a fixture draw for clubs that run their own internal competitions alongside the mandated one.

The gap both leave — your website and your comms

Here is the thing neither platform is trying to do, and it is not a criticism of either: neither one is your club.

PlayHQ is explicitly not a website or club-administration product. Squadi's club-facing surface is thin. So the following jobs remain entirely yours, on both:

• A public website that is actually yours, on your own domain, that a sponsor or a grant assessor can be sent to.
• News, match reports, photos and the season's story.
• Sponsors — logos, packages, acquittal reporting, renewals.
• Merchandise, uniforms and the second-hand kit table.
• Events beyond fixtures — presentation night, quiz night, the season launch.
• Canteen and duty rosters, and the volunteer chase that goes with them.
• Governance — AGM notices, minutes, the register of members, policies.
• Wet weather notices that reach a phone in ten minutes rather than an hour.
• Newsletters, welcome packs and the whole membership relationship between rounds.

There is also a search consequence that committees rarely notice. Because competition platforms publish so many public fixture and ladder pages, searching your club's name can return a page you neither wrote nor control — accurate, useful, and completely silent about your coaching program, your sponsors and your open days. Owning a real site on your own domain is how you decide what a stranger sees first. Our netball club rundown walks through the rest of the operating year, and if you are also feeding numbers upwards, reporting to your governing body covers that chore.

A first-month checklist for any platform you inherit

Do these once, at the start of the season, and the rest of the year gets quieter.

1. Write down who holds club administrator access — two people, never one, and never only an outgoing committee member.
2. Confirm the email address on the account is a club address, not a personal one.
3. Get the fee stack in writing and publish a plain-language version on your own site.
4. Find the escalation path — who at the association you contact when something breaks on a Saturday morning.
5. Test the participant checkout yourself, on a phone, as a parent would see it.
6. Confirm what data you can export, in what format, and download a copy at season's end.
7. Decide where your source of truth lives for member contact details, because it will not be the competition platform once someone changes phone numbers.
8. Agree the wet weather chain — who decides, who posts, and on which channel families are actually watching.
9. Note the season rollover date and what happens to last year's teams.
10. Record all of the above in your handover file so next year's committee inherits knowledge, not archaeology.

Running the club half, whichever rails you are on

If your competition data is handled and your headache is everything else — the website, the sponsors, the presentation night, the wet weather text at 7am — that is the layer we build. ClubHelix gives your club a real site on your own domain through a canvas page editor, plus broadcasts that reach members by email and push rather than hoping they check a feed. For the competitions you run yourselves — internal ladders, social comps, carnivals, club championships — there are full competitions with fixtures, ladders and finals, and a live match centre for scores as they happen.

The free tier is enough to run a whole season alongside your mandated platform and judge whether the two sit comfortably together. Nobody has to ask what it costs — the plans are on the pricing page — and the platform is built in Australia and hosted here too. Most committees can start a club site in the gap between the draw landing and round one. Our fuller take on running a club website beside national competition rails is at /compare/playhq-club-website.

The boundary, stated plainly: we have no governing-body distribution deals, so we will never be the platform your sport mandates, and we would not advise any club to move its official registrations off the pipeline that carries its insurance, clearances and competition eligibility. For your sport's official competition data, the inherited platform stays the system of record. We are the half of the job it was never built to do.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Squadi and PlayHQ?

Both are registration and competition platforms distributed to clubs through governing-body arrangements rather than sold directly. PlayHQ runs national competition rails for four very large participation sports and carries an enormous public fixture, ladder and result layer. Squadi is a newer entrant with a footprint including Football Queensland, Touch Football Australia and netball programs, and it carries ground-level capabilities such as referee appointment and payments, team sheets and instalment payments.

Can a club choose between them?

Usually not. Both arrive with your affiliation, and the decision sits with the governing body that signed the contract. The productive question for a committee is not which to pick but what your platform covers, what your participants pay, and what remains the club's responsibility.

What do these platforms cost a club?

In the arrangements we can verify, neither charges clubs a platform subscription — PlayHQ is funded by national body contracts, and Football Queensland states there are no platform costs to clubs under its Squadi arrangement. Costs surface elsewhere, mainly as participant-side transaction fees that vary by sport, so ask your own governing body for its itemised fee schedule rather than relying on any general figure.

Does either give our club a website?

No. One is explicitly not a website or club-administration product, and the other's club-facing surface is thin. Public competition pages are useful for looking up a fixture, but they are the competition's pages rather than yours — no news, sponsors, shop, events or membership story. Clubs on either platform still need their own web presence.

We already have a platform for competitions — is a second system just duplication?

Only if you duplicate the same job. The overlap risk is registrations and results, which should stay on the mandated rails. The gap is everything between rounds — communications, sponsors, events, commerce, governance — which the competition platform was never built for. Keep one source of truth per job and the two sit together comfortably.

Our committee is unhappy with the platform we were given. What can we realistically do?

Raise it through the association or state body, in writing and with specifics, because platform arrangements do get reviewed and club feedback feeds those reviews. In the meantime, focus your energy on the parts you genuinely control — your website, your communications, your events and your own commerce — none of which depend on the governing body's choice.

---

Keep reading — gameday vs playhq covers the other inherited-platform match-up, and how to make a fixture draw is for the competitions your club runs itself.